UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of Administrative Law Judges

  • Menu
  • About OALJ
    • Overview
    • About the Chief Judge
    • FAQs
    • Organizational Chart
  • Contacts
    • Contacting OALJ
    • National Office
    • BALCA
    • District Offices:
      • Boston, MA
      • Cherry Hill, NJ
      • Cincinnati, OH
      • Covington, LA
      • Newport News, VA
      • Pittsburgh, PA
      • San Francisco, CA
      • Washington, DC
  • Keyword / Case Number Searches
  • DMS Search
  • Case Status
DOL Home > OALJ > Whistleblower > Paul v. USF Glen Moore Transport, ARB No. 03-089, ALJ No. 2002-STA-16 (ARB Oct. 31, 2003)
USDOL/OALJ Reporter

Paul v. USF Glen Moore Transport, ARB No. 03-089, ALJ No. 2002-STA-16 (ARB Oct. 31, 2003)


U.S. Department of LaborAdministrative Review Board
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20210
DOL Seal

ARB CASE NO. 03-089
ALJ CASE NO. 02-STA-016
DATE: October 31, 2003

In the Matter of:

ROBERT C. PAUL,
    COMPLAINANT,

    v.

USF GLEN MOORE TRANSPORT,
    RESPONDENT.

BEFORE: THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD

Appearances:

For the Complainant:
    John B. Kelly, II, Esq., Kievit, Kelly & Odom, Pensacola, Florida

For the Respondent:
    J. Jay Cooper, Esq., Goldberg, Katzman & Shipman, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

FINAL ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

   This case arises under Section 405, the employee protection provision, of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982, 49 U.S.C.A. § 31105 (West 1997), and implementing regulations at 29 C.F.R. Part 1978 (2003). The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) below issued a Recommended Decision and Order recommending approval of the parties' settlement agreement and dismissal of the complaint with prejudice. Paul v. USF Glen Moore Transp., ALJ No. 02-STA-016 (Apr. 18, 2003).

   Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1978.109(c), the Administrative Review Board "shall issue the final decision and order based on the record and the decision and order of the administrative law judge." On May 7, 2003, counsel for Respondent advised the Board that Respondent has no objections to the Recommended Decision and Order. On October 31, 2003, the Complainant, Robert Paul, advised the Board that he has no objections to the Recommended Decision and Order.


[Page 2]

   We concur with the ALJ's determination that the parties' settlement agreement is fair, adequate and reasonable. We adopt as our own the ALJ's Recommended Decision and Order Approving Settlement and Dismissing with Prejudice and attach it herewith.

CONCLUSION

   The parties have agreed to settle the Complainant's STAA claim. Accordingly, we APPROVE the agreement and DISMISS the complaint.

   SO ORDERED.

      JUDITH S. BOGGS
      Administrative Appeals Judge

      M. CYNHIA DOUGLASS
      Chief Administrative Appeals Judge

UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

United States Department of Labor
Office of Administrative Law Judges
800 K St NW
Washington, DC 20001
(202) 693-7300
www.oalj.dol.gov

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

  • White House
  • USA.gov
  • NO FEAR Act Data
  • U.S. Office of Special Counsel

LABOR DEPARTMENT

  • EspaƱol
  • Office of Inspector General
  • Subscribe to the DOL Newsletter
  • Read the DOL Newsletter
  • Emergency Accountability Status Link
  • A to Z Index

ABOUT THE SITE

  • Freedom of Information Act
  • Privacy and Security Statement
  • Disclaimers
  • Important Website Notices
  • Plug-Ins Used on DOL.gov
  • Accessibility Statement