UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of Administrative Law Judges

  • Menu
  • About OALJ
    • Overview
    • About the Chief Judge
    • FAQs
    • Organizational Chart
  • Contacts
    • Contacting OALJ
    • National Office
    • BALCA
    • District Offices:
      • Boston, MA
      • Cherry Hill, NJ
      • Cincinnati, OH
      • Covington, LA
      • Newport News, VA
      • Pittsburgh, PA
      • San Francisco, CA
      • Washington, DC
  • Keyword / Case Number Searches
  • DMS Search
  • Case Status
DOL Home > OALJ > Whistleblower > Patey v. Sinclair Oil Corp., 96-STA-20 (ARB Nov. 12, 1996)
USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Patey v. Sinclair Oil Corp., 96-STA-20 (ARB Nov. 12, 1996)


U.S. Department of Labor
Administrative Review Board
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20210

ARB CASE NO. 96-174
(ALJ CASE NO. 96-STA-20)
DATE: NOV 12 1996

In the Matter of:

MICHAEL A. PATEY,
    Complainant,

v.

SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION,
d/b/a SINCLAIR TRUCKING
COMPANY,
    Respondent.

BEFORE: THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD1

FINAL DECISION AND ORDER

   The Administrative law Judge (ALJ) submitted a Recommended Decision and Order (R. D. and 0.) in this case arising under the employee protection provision of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 (STAA), 49 U.S.C.A. § 31105 (West 1994), finding that Respondent Sinclair Oil Corporation did not discriminate against Complainant ichael Patey when it discharged him from his job as a fuel oil delivery truck driver. Patey refused to deliver fuel oil to a railroad, where his duties required refueling of idling locomotives, because he believed it was unsafe, but the ALJ found Patey's concerns were unreasonable under the circumstances. The record has been reviewed and we find there is substantial evidence in the


[Page 2]

record to support the ALJ's finding that Sinclair did not violate the STAA when it discharged Patey. Sinclair fully responded to each of Patey's concerns, R. D. and O. at 4, so that his refusal to drive was not protected under 49 U.S. C. A. § 31105(a)(2). We adopt the ALJ's R. D. and O. (attached) and this complaint is DISMISSED.

   SO ORDERED.

      DAVID A. O'BRIEN
      Chair

      KARL J. SANDSTROM
      Member

      JOYCE D. MILLER
      Alternate Member

[ENDNOTES]

1 On April 17, 1996, a Secretary's Order was signed delegating jurisdiction to issue final agency decisions under this statute to the newly created Administrative Review Board. 61 Fed. Reg. 19978 (May 3, 1996). Secretary's Order 2-96 contains a comprehensive list of the statutes, executive order, and regulations under which the Administrative Review Board now issues final agency decisions. Final procedural revisions to the regulations implementing this reorganization were also promulgated on that date. 61 Fed. Reg. 19982.

UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

United States Department of Labor
Office of Administrative Law Judges
800 K St NW
Washington, DC 20001
(202) 693-7300
www.oalj.dol.gov

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

  • White House
  • USA.gov
  • NO FEAR Act Data
  • U.S. Office of Special Counsel

LABOR DEPARTMENT

  • EspaƱol
  • Office of Inspector General
  • Subscribe to the DOL Newsletter
  • Read the DOL Newsletter
  • Emergency Accountability Status Link
  • A to Z Index

ABOUT THE SITE

  • Freedom of Information Act
  • Privacy and Security Statement
  • Disclaimers
  • Important Website Notices
  • Plug-Ins Used on DOL.gov
  • Accessibility Statement