UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of Administrative Law Judges

  • Menu
  • About OALJ
    • Overview
    • About the Chief Judge
    • FAQs
    • Organizational Chart
  • Contacts
    • Contacting OALJ
    • National Office
    • BALCA
    • District Offices:
      • Boston, MA
      • Cherry Hill, NJ
      • Cincinnati, OH
      • Covington, LA
      • Newport News, VA
      • Pittsburgh, PA
      • San Francisco, CA
      • Washington, DC
  • Keyword / Case Number Searches
  • DMS Search
  • Case Status
  • DOL Home
  • OALJ
  • WIA, JTPA and CETA
  • Arizona Dep't of Economic Security v. USDOL, 94-JTP-18 (ARB July 19, 1996)
USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Arizona Dep't of Economic Security v. USDOL, 94-JTP-18 (ARB July 19, 1996)


U.S. Department of Labor
Administrative Review Board
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20210

CASE NO. 94-JTP-18
DATE: July 19, 1996

In the Matter of :

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY

and

CITY OF PHOENIX,

COMPLAINANTS/APPELLANTS

v.

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

RESPONDENT/APPELLEE.

BEFORE: THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD1

ORDER GRANTING STAY

    The Arizona Department of Economic Security (ADES) and the City of Phoenix have requested a stay in the implementation of the Administrative Review Board's Final Decision and Order in this matter, pending a Petition for Review filed before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The Board's Order required ADES to repay to the U.S. Department of Labor (USDOL) a sum of money disallowed by the Grant Officer as JTPA costs.

    Upon consideration of the request, it is ORDERED that--

    1. Implementation of the Final Decision and Order in this case IS STAYED pending review of it by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; and that

    2. The stay IS CONDITIONED UPON submission by ADES to the USDOL, within 30 days of the issuance of this Order, of a written agreement by ADES that, within 30 days after a decision by the court of appeals favorable to the USDOL has become final, ADES shall pay in cash in non-Federal funds to USDOL, the principal amount determined by the court to be owed to USDOL, and such further amount as may accrue in interest during the pendency of the court's review at the interest rates which USDOL would normally charge for delayed payment of the principal amount during that period. 29 C.F.R. § 20.50 et seq. Department of Labor v. State of Florida Dep't of Labor and Employment Security, Sec. Final Dec. And Order, Case No. 84-CTA-228, Dec. 9. 1988; Florida Dep't of Labor v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 893 F.2d 1319 (11th Cir. 1990)(affirmed on other grounds).

SO ORDERED.

DAVID A. O'BRIEN
Chair

KARL J. SANDSTROM
Member

JOYCE D. MILLER
Alternate Member

[ENDNOTES]

1On April 17, 1996, a Secretary's Order was signed delegating jurisdiction to issue final agency decisions under the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA), 29 U.S.C. ¶¶ 1501-1791 (1988) and the regulations issued thereunder at 20 C.F.R. Parts 626-638 (1995), to the Administrative Review Board. 61 Fed. Reg. 19978 (May 3, 1996). The Board issued a Final Decision and Order in this case captioned Arizona Department of Economic Security v. U.S. Department of Labor, on June 7, 1996.

UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

United States Department of Labor
Office of Administrative Law Judges
800 K St NW
Washington, DC 20001
(202) 693-7300
www.oalj.dol.gov

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

  • White House
  • USA.gov
  • NO FEAR Act Data
  • U.S. Office of Special Counsel

LABOR DEPARTMENT

  • EspaƱol
  • Office of Inspector General
  • Subscribe to the DOL Newsletter
  • Read the DOL Newsletter
  • Emergency Accountability Status Link
  • A to Z Index

ABOUT THE SITE

  • Freedom of Information Act
  • Privacy and Security Statement
  • Disclaimers
  • Important Website Notices
  • Plug-Ins Used on DOL.gov
  • Accessibility Statement